American Innovator Unveils JudgeX to Detect When a Judge has taken a bribe or behaved "Out-of-Control”

A renowned American innovator has introduced "JudgeX," a revolutionary mathematical tool intended to accurately identify judicial bribery. The tool aims to improve the detection of corruption within the judicial system, offering a data-driven approach to enhance transparency and accountability.

In a press release announcing the launch of the groundbreaking tool on Tuesday, October 1, James Todd Wagner stated that JudgeX is an adaptation of the "battle-proven" Statistical Process Control (SPC) method, into judicial processes. The tool analyzes ambiguous facts and resolves them into a single number, making "Bribery/No Bribery obvious.”

"JudgeX can also identify a bribe by graphically tracking the historical output of a judge," said Wagner, a Yale School of Mechanical Engineering graduate with a solid background in economics and game theory.

He explained that "a JudgeX indicator of 'Out-of-Control' Judicial Machinery exposes corrupt judges without needing to follow the money," and noted that the rise of cryptocurrency has made it almost impossible to trace bribery through traditional money trails.

As a confessed victim of an allegedly corrupt judicial process, Wagner asserts that new judicial controls are necessary for the equitable operation of society. "The only way to identify judicial bribery with accuracy” he says, “is to use math to analyze the EXTERNAL/VISUAL OUTPUT of the judge."

"The near-impossibility of proving a physical cash payment was made—now that cryptocurrency has become the preferred method of bribery—frustrates honest lawyers on ethics boards," he said.

In a paper published on JudgeX.org, Wagner further explains how the tool, developed with Yale School of Management professor Art Swersey, goes beyond evaluating judicial actions for compliance with laws and norms, such as whether laws are enforced routinely or selectively.

The tool, he further notes in the detailed Paper will also help assess the style of each judge, "When the STYLE of a particular judge suddenly deviates from their personal style, it signals that the judge has been bribed to deviate," said Wagner, who was involved in a lengthy legal battle with Warren Mosler in the case "James Todd Wagner & SEI vs. Warren Mosler & MACC."

Statistical Process Control for judicial actions, the Paper postulates, "should serve as evidence that the judge did (or did not) engage in the criminal activity of accepting a bribe to influence the outcome of a trial in favor of the bribing party."

"SPC will expose a SERIES of judicial actions that ignore the law or the norms of the legal system. Since this is the only reasonable evidence available to prove criminal bribery, SPC must be accepted as the standard," the paper states.

The JudgeX innovator, who pledges not to seek any monetary gains from the tool has applied for the United States patent on the technology and is optimistic that it will not only contribute to stopping ‘tyranny of judicial bribery’, but also help the less privileged and victims of corrupt judicial systems to access justice.

He is hopeful that with a shift in the calculus of crime toward fairness, the wealthy who bribe officials to avoid accountability—especially in countries where bribery of judges is commonplace and undermines ordinary people's access to justice—will begin to change their ways.

Wagner concludes that the technology to determine when a judge has gone statistically "out of control"—indicating that they have taken a bribe—will be made available at no cost to anyone who wishes to "Make Our World Fair Again."